Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Lars Wirzenius, Stefano Zacchiroli and myself are trying to introduce > the concept of Debian Enhancement Proposals, which I had in mind for > many months until purely by chance, in the Extremadura QA meeting last > December, I brought it up to Lars, and together with Zack we produced an > initial draft. After some feedback on that draft and some later work, we > are now bringing it up for discussion here.
A minor comment: How about mandating that DEP documents must be licensed under a free license? It may be useful to be able to include DEPs into the Debian distribution, as documentation, but if the license isn't clear that isn't possible. Further, I don't see any reason to permit non-free DEP documents, or is there one? Thoughts? To be concrete, I would add the following sentence in the 'Creating a DEP' section: Note in your DEP the license it is released under, it must be a DFSG-free license. Of course, DEP0 would then need to follow that advice and note which license the document is released under... :) /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
