On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:56:51AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:51:56AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > While Debian Live is really nice, some things could be improved about > > > it. Each time I wanted to use it, I ran into an issue that required > > > going to IRC to ask how to work around the problem (the problem was > > > always already known). > > > > as you know, debian testing and unstable are in flux and depends heavily > > on the maintainers ability to fix core packages for debian-live (e.g. > > kernel-modules). if those are broken, debian-live is broken. > > Maybe debian-live could coordinate with d-i to release some beta* > snapshots of the testing distribution which are known to work.
The debian-installer team is already lacking enough dedicated people to
properly answer all its bug reports [1]. More releases (of any kinds)
that would not have been fully tested would mean more reports. As this
would be on top of all other d-i duties, I strongly doubt that it would
be a good idea.
[1] Most of them are against the pseudo-package "installation-reports".
And most of them do not actually reports bug in the installer itself
but in other parts of Debian.
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio .''`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
