Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:56:51AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: >> Maybe debian-live could coordinate with d-i to release some beta* >> snapshots of the testing distribution which are known to work.
that's not actually a problem. the only overlapping thing is the kernel and live-installer, wheras the latter is almost but not quite ready for prime-time. apart from that, -live images and d-i images can be released completely independent. > The debian-installer team is already lacking enough dedicated people to > properly answer all its bug reports [1]. More releases (of any kinds) > that would not have been fully tested would mean more reports. As this > would be on top of all other d-i duties, I strongly doubt that it would > be a good idea. when d-i beta2 is there, it would be nice to have /combined/ -live images (that is a live image with normal d-i netinstall on it). they could be released one day after beta2 release is on the mirrors. as the d-i part on those images do not differ from the normal d-i images, i don't see any additional burden for d-i team. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
