Le Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:17:45PM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:24:52AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Non-free is there just because the free counterparts aren't optimal. > > > Someday > > > these will, and non-free will just disappear from Debian :) > > > > Non-free is for GNU documentation. > > I think we should consider (post-lenny) splitting up non-free in a > couple of sub-categories. Personally, I'd prefer "fsf-free", but > "non-free-docs" would be just as good, besides "non-free-firmware" and > "non-free" for the rest.
Hi Michael, How about Debtags? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
