"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like this idea, but without mentioning FSF directly. More entities than > just the FSF use the GNU FDL for licensing.
I agree. The FSF also have no "free document definition" or similar and I believe their position on documents is a convenience measure in part to help them get manuals published/sponsored by legacy publishers who would otherwise cut out the manifesto. [...] > It would be nice if non-free was a simple umbrella for non-free-*. > Possibly non-free/documentation and non-free/firmware? Sounds good to me, as well as leaving the subdivision to the developer. Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ (Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
