Hi! Readding IMHO relevant quote for Alexanders Question:
* Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> [2010-05-03 10:45:59 CEST]: > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: >> On 02.05.2010 16:45, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >>> the Debian Project Leader recently asked DSA in his delegation[1] to >>> fix a flaw in the current version of the DMUP, the fact that >>> expulsions are DAM's domain, and not our's. >> >> Could you please explain, why this is a flaw? > > I think that I should do that, but first let me quote the "Comments" > section of the delegation text, as it was precisely my attempt at > explaining that: > > > The first proposed limit to what can be changed by DSA is meant to fix > > a "flaw" in the current text. Decisions over Debian membership are > > already a responsibility of DAM and, especially considering the need > > of changing the DMUP, it is better not to mix that responsibility with > > DSA (as a paranoid mind can imagine DSA changing DMUP *precisely* to > > have a specific developer expelled ...). Note that this limit means > > that the current DMUP text is outside the rules and should hence be > > fixed ASAP. Then I think Martin has a bit unfortunately worded his statement - it sounds a bit that he thinks that expulsion should be DSA's domain. I hope this is a misunderstanding, and the rest of the thread also looks like expulsion should still be DAM's domain, account locking should be DSA's domain. Thanks for confirming that we only had a misunderstanding in several parts here in advance! So long! Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
