Charles Plessy <[email protected]> writes: > I have the following questions about my draft (see below).
> - Is a charset parameter helpful in the cases a program would fall back > on text/plain, or is it useless or confusiong as the machine-readable > copyright spec already requires files to be encoded in UTF-8 ? I would leave charset in. A lot of MIME software will look at that for any text/* type and will expect 7-bit ASCII if it's not present. > - Would an optional parameter "revision" be useful, or is this premature ? I think it's a good idea. You may get some pushback on encoding that in the subtype instead of in a parameter, but I think a parameter is the right approach. > - About security, the discussion on debian-devel leads me to think that > there is no need to worry. I included a short comment suggesting that > field values should be sanitised as usual. Does anybody see other > potential security issues ? No, your security considerations seem reasonable to me. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
