Le Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:51:24AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:10:18AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > here is the information that I consider submitting to the IANA. > > > Person & email address to contact for further information: > > Charles Plessy <[email protected]> > […] > > Change controller: > > The Debian Project <http://www.debian.org> > > I wonder if the contact address shouldn't be something less tied to > project individuals, like for instance [email protected]. Given > there is already a separation between this and the author field > (allowing to give proper credit to who worked on the application), I > think it'd be better to have as contact point some "role address" of > sort. What do you think?
Hi Stefano and [email protected] subscribers, I was wondering about the same, but I was worried that having a broad-readership mailing list as a contact point would create confusion about who is expected to answer. How about [email protected] ? It is anyway the contact point for the specification itself. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
