On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: >>> When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining >>> Upstream >>> why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work to >>> be >>> distributed in Debian. What are the crucial changes that made CC BY 2.5 >>> Free >>> while CC BY 2.0 is non-Free ? >> Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom between >> CC BY 2.5, and CC BY 2.0, how about accepting CC BY 2.0 in Debian ?
We don't want 2.5 in main, we want 3.0. So why? -- bye, Joerg I guess some people never change. Or, they quickly change and then quickly change back. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
