Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: > > >>> When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining > >>> Upstream > >>> why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work > >>> to be > >>> distributed in Debian. What are the crucial changes that made CC BY 2.5 > >>> Free > >>> while CC BY 2.0 is non-Free ? > >> Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom > >> between > >> CC BY 2.5, and CC BY 2.0, how about accepting CC BY 2.0 in Debian ? > > We don't want 2.5 in main, we want 3.0. So why?
Sorry, I was mislead by the presence of 2.5 in awstats and grub2-splashimages... This said, what is wrong with 2.0 and 2.5, that 3.0 fixes ? -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
