On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, "Stefano Zacchiroli" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Its not just you - while I appreciate using a word other than bitesized or > > low-hanging-fruit, I tend to get the same slightly off putting feeling > > about "gift" > > > > Not to bikeshead. > > So, folks, what do you propose instead? :) > > If the chosen terminology send the "wrong" message, and hence it's > potentially a blocker, let's change it (but better do it only *once*, > hence the need of getting it "right" this time).
I don't want to give the wrong impression - I'll still use the chosen tag, but if I'm to play the Umarell, I'd be most likely to use "bitesize" Seriously, I don't want to get between work getting done, though. T > > Cheers. > -- > Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o > Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o > Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . > « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
