On 24/09/13 14:09, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, "Stefano Zacchiroli" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > Its not just you - while I appreciate using a word other than > bitesized or > > > low-hanging-fruit, I tend to get the same slightly off putting feeling > > > about "gift" > > > > > > Not to bikeshead. > > > > So, folks, what do you propose instead? :) > > > > If the chosen terminology send the "wrong" message, and hence it's > > potentially a blocker, let's change it (but better do it only *once*, > > hence the need of getting it "right" this time). > > I don't want to give the wrong impression - I'll still use the chosen > tag, but if I'm to play the Umarell, I'd be most likely to use "bitesize" > > Seriously, I don't want to get between work getting done, though. >
However people feel about "gift", there is also the jargon factor. For newcomers, jargon is a barrier and potential time waster Can we use a word that is neutral and obvious? Maybe "trivial-to-fix" or something like that?
