Hi, On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: > Unfortunately I have a problem with the renaming of my pet service > Buildd.Net on https://wiki.debian.org/Services. I added my service as > BuilddNet and it got renamed to "UnofficialBuilddNet". Although it's > true that it's an unofficial service, I feel great discomfort with the > prefix "Unofficial". No other service has this prefix and I sense > disadvantage (not to say: discrimination) about the stigma of being > named the only "Unofficial" service on that page. So I propose either > the removal of "Unofficial" from the title "UnofficialBuilddNet" to > "BuilddNet" or "Buildd.Net" or adding tags "official" and "unofficial" > for each service so that everyone can differentiate between unofficial > and official services by using a filter or such. But I really object > against being the only service named "Unofficial".
I don't have a strong opinion about the addition/removal of this prefix but I'd like to point out that contrary to other services, this one reuses the "buildd" keyword which is already associated to buildd.debian.org and it's a service which duplicates features with an already existing service. I guess that's the main reasons why Martin added the prefix to disambiguate its status. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
