On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:14:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: > > Unfortunately I have a problem with the renaming of my pet service > > Buildd.Net on https://wiki.debian.org/Services. I added my service as > > BuilddNet and it got renamed to "UnofficialBuilddNet". Although it's > > true that it's an unofficial service, I feel great discomfort with the > > prefix "Unofficial". No other service has this prefix and I sense > > disadvantage (not to say: discrimination) about the stigma of being > > named the only "Unofficial" service on that page. So I propose either > > the removal of "Unofficial" from the title "UnofficialBuilddNet" to > > "BuilddNet" or "Buildd.Net" or adding tags "official" and "unofficial" > > for each service so that everyone can differentiate between unofficial > > and official services by using a filter or such. But I really object > > against being the only service named "Unofficial". > > I don't have a strong opinion about the addition/removal of this prefix > but I'd like to point out that contrary to other services, this one > reuses the "buildd" keyword which is already associated to > buildd.debian.org and it's a service which duplicates features > with an already existing service.
Calling it BuilddNet should be quite sufficient for that purpose. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140219105756.GC17633@yellowpig
