On May 25, 2019 9:16:09 PM UTC, Holger Levsen <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:49:13PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: >> b) The only case where I would consider a forced removal of >> somebody else's feed by somebody who is not part of planet >> admin to be justified would be if the further inclusion of the >> feed on planet would constitute a criminal offence in the >> jurisdiction where the webserver that serves planet.debian.org >> is located > >I can think of *much* annoying or disturbing content which is 100% >legal, please don't make me show you... > >To start with a harmless example, starting tomorrow I will post 42 cat >pics in 4k resolution, per hour. Annoying, but no emergency. Exactly the kind of case that should be passed to and left for the planet admins. Scott K
- Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another D... Sam Hartman
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if ... Ian Jackson
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if ... Jonathan Carter
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do... Sam Hartman
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should ... Mathias Behrle
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Sho... Sam Hartman
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should ... Holger Levsen
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Sho... Scott Kitterman
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do... Ian Campbell
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if ... Joerg Jaspert
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if ... Benj. Mako Hill
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do... Scott Kitterman
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should ... Norbert Preining
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Sho... Sam Hartman
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: Wha... Norbert Preining
- Re: Question for Planet Admins:... Sam Hartman
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should ... Philip Hands
- Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Sho... Charles Plessy

