Hi Roberto, Regardless of whatever could be my political views (which I'm trying to set aside), there's issues with your reasoning below:
On 2/20/20 2:20 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Another and clearly better and more inclusive approach would be to not > "penalize" people for the government under which they happen to live. Doing a debconf in a country with such a controversy isn't penalizing just the few DDs living there, but the whole project. The number of people that decided not to go is self-explanatory. Not doing a debconf doesn't penalize anyone, it just happens elsewhere and the people you're talking about can still attend... Also, accepting a Debconf in Israel has nothing to do with being inclusive. It's the opposite way. These people who you're asking for being more inclusive are in fact not attending because they would like the hosting state to be more "inclusive" itself (ie: with the Palestinians). So your request for being more "inclusive" will obviously fail here. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
