[Josselin Mouette, 28.03.2007] > While the discussion is still ongoing about the "current" keyword, it > seems that everyone agrees with the other changes which are only loosely > related. Can we proceed with these, until we agree on how "current" > should be replaced?
IMHO, yes -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-
pgpMzbtEu5Fxx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
