What was the MathJax complain about? I maybe can help you with that. -- Dmitry Shachnev
On 10/28/12, Thomas Kluyver <tho...@kluyver.me.uk> wrote: > On 28 October 2012 08:47, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote: > >> I assume that building the binary packages from a single source package >>>> is preferred? >>>> >>> sympy devs reckon we should use the separate release tarballs. Is that >>> acceptable for Debian? >>> >> >> Yes. > > > OK. I've committed the minor changes (diff attached) to update the Python 2 > package to 0.7.2. I tried to add a -docs package with the Sphinx docs, but > it complained about Mathjax, so I've left it for now. If that sounds OK, > could someone upload it? > > Also attached is the new packaging for the Python 3 version. This now calls > the script isympy3. Is it OK to svn-inject this? And is python3-sympy the > right name to use for the SVN directory? > > Thanks, > Thomas > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKimPHW6spofq5yX6_jWq+T-=xkahjxpr_fodcby-s+9fo+...@mail.gmail.com
