On Sep 05, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >From my point of view, since you're anyway using features of >git-buildpackage, it would be better to improve git-buildpackage... >I like how git-dpm can keep patches applied on the packaging >branch and porting the required shell to "gbp pq" should not be >too complicated. It would also be nice if we could fix "gbp pq" to not >rename quilt patches.
Maybe. What I thankfully left out of my description was the dozen gbp-pq directories I had to trash when I tried to do something that *seemed* to make sense but ended up just borking my directory. Sometimes I could chuck the changes and try again, but more often than not, I just rmdir'd and started over. Even after getting it right (and updating my draft), I still don't feel like gbp-pq is very resilient. I wrote the git-dpm bits after just one or two such experiments. Either way, I think we need better focused task-oriented documentation! Cheers, -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
