Hi, I've made some limited progress trying to package Bokeh (BSD-3-Clause) upstream: http://bokeh.pydata.org/en/latest/ my packaging: https://github.com/detrout/python-bokeh
I managed to get the version 0.9.1 from pypi installable. (Though since it was my own experiments I didn't remove the jquery / bootstrap libraries.) The most proper packaging would require grunt to be able to rebuild bokeh.js. I was wondering if releasing the pypi version would be good enough. (The package does at least contain a non-minimized version of bokeh.js) (And it looks like someone may have signed up to try and deal with the ITP for bokeh #756017) I recently tried to update to bokeh 0.9.3 and their unit tests flushed out a few more dependencies. I just packaged abstract_rendering (BSD-3-Clause) upstream: https://github.com/ContinuumIO/abstract_rendering/ my packaging: https://github.com/detrout/python-abstract-rendering Bokeh's unit tests also appear to depend on blaze, and that looks like that has several missing dependencies. Currently I built the packaging following the debian-qt team's common standards (source-less), Thought It looks like the python-modules team is just about to transition to git-dpm. Should I go ahead and submit abstract_rendering? Should I work on getting blaze submitted? Diane
