Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> writes: > Is this now official policy for new/updated/converted Python modules > maintained by DPMT? > > Is it official policy for new/updated/converted Python applications > maintained by PAPT?
I am not exactly an authoritive figure, but I believe the answer to both of these is yes. It is possible that there are a number of packages that still need to be converted. I had a script on aloth to do this, it might need updating for salsa. Especially as it relied on direct access to the git directory to change the default branch. > At the moment each of those pages says that the Python teams have chosen > the relevant packaging system and that the other packaging system is > forbidden, which is confusing at best. Both pages do need updating. -- Brian May <b...@debian.org>
