Good idea! Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last > 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
including or excluding SPAM? :) > The bugs that will be renamed are approximately (my local bts mirror is > a few days out of date) the following: (the filed and changed numbers > are the dates of opening and last change of the bug, in days before today) You know what? The list is sick, purely sick. You should probably inform each submitter as well. This could be considered as reminder for him as well as a way to intervene if he's still working on it/gave up or whatever, so he could retitle or reopen the bug report. You may also take these comments into account. I haven't checked if the person who sent an ITP is also working on them. That's left to you for practice. :)) If they're not equal the bug should probably be retitled, if not then not but the submitter probably should receive a reminder. (sidenote: mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is also publically logged in the bts, so no need to send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > The following ITP's will be renamed to RFP's > ============================================ > squeak #68122, filed: 1168, changed 1168 You can get the newest Debian packages from ftp://ftp.ira.uka.de/pub/squeak/debian/debian-2.2/2.8/ > openoffice #74715, filed: 457, changed 109 Being worked on. > gnu-pop3d #75696, filed: 444, changed 444 Contact Shaleh, I seem to recall he waited for an upstream release or something. We already had that package but it was abandoned later. > sapdb #88988, filed: 311, changed 305 Eckes is/was working on it. > subversion #97234, filed: 247, changed 247 ITP'er about to retract the ITP, so go. > openoffice #101762, filed: 207, changed 109 Ehm, didn't we have that already? > apache2 #103471, filed: 194, changed 194 DanielS and thom are/were working on it. Regards, Joey -- The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media. -- H. Peter Anvin Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
