On 13/12/09 at 16:39 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > I think we should understand how many things have been broken by this: > > if they're many we can ask for the revert and start porting the code, if > > we're a few just fix them. The PTS, for once, can easily be fixed: it > > would be enough to remember the most recent version read while importing > > Sources (but unfortunately I didn't have time to do that this week-end). > > > > How about mailing -devel and ask people to report breakages? (better if > > with pointers to the already reported bugs) > > * DEHS: fixed to make it work with current Sources, but it uses the first > version it finds, which happens to be the oldest
That doesn't really count as "fixed" :-) > * security tracker: fixed > * lintian.d.o: not even reported, just noticed it > * PTS: dunno * PTS: affected, not fixed yet * DDPO: affected, not fixed yet AFAIK * britney: fixed * piuparts.d.o: dunno * UDD: well, "it's not a bug, it's a feature". added a view to provide the old information. Some CGIs or views are probably still broken. * my archive rebuild scripts were affected (fixed) * Ubuntu syncs might be affected as well Now, packages: * debmirror? * APT proxies? * Stuff in devscripts? (dd-list works fine) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
