On 13/12/09 at 17:00 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > On 13/12/09 at 16:39 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> * DEHS: fixed to make it work with current Sources, but it uses the first > >> version it finds, which happens to be the oldest > > > > That doesn't really count as "fixed" :-) > > It's better than just failing to update the database because the > (package,release) unique constraint is not met :). > > > > >> * security tracker: fixed > >> * lintian.d.o: not even reported, just noticed it > >> * PTS: dunno > > > > * PTS: affected, not fixed yet > > * DDPO: affected, not fixed yet AFAIK > > * britney: fixed > > Right, I forgot about britney migrating different package versions :) > > > * piuparts.d.o: dunno > > * UDD: well, "it's not a bug, it's a feature". added a view to provide > > the old information. Some CGIs or views are probably still broken. > > Why not do it the other way around? that way less things will break.
Sadly, I think that we will have to live with this change. So it's better if UDD exports that "inconsistancy" by default, and provides a way to hide it. > > * my archive rebuild scripts were affected (fixed) > > Mines will happily accept any number of versions, but it's useless to test > old versions. Well, mine too, but reporting bugs about older versions was not a good idea. > > Now, packages: > > * debmirror? > > I only use it for binary packages, and seems to be working fine (in spite of > the multiple arch:all packages). Gah, there are multiple arch:all packages as well? That increases quite a lot the potential for failures. > > * APT proxies? > > * Stuff in devscripts? (dd-list works fine) > > Have you checked if it considers the latest version? No. It uses the last one listed using apt-cache showsrc (but that's broken anyway if you have unstable+testing in your sources.list). I'm preparing a mail to -de...@. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
