On 07/27/2018 03:51 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: >> I'm 99% sure it's not a hard dependency. It's a documentation utility. > > Which is then used by many packages, please check the other mail I have just > sent.
For building documentation in binary-arch packages? Again, we should not allow that. It's a waste of disk space and buildd capacity, it's also something that the QA tests will complain about. > [snip] >>> If for some reason a package build it's doc on an arch-specific build it >>> will FTBFS. >> >> Then this package is clearly buggy. Documentation is arch-independent and >> should never be built per architecture. > > You have a point here. Ok, so you agree. > Mm, just noticed you sign as Adrian and not as John, will try to remember > that. Yes, I go by Adrian despite the order. Don't ask why. My mother thought it was funny :P. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
