In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto: > > I'm pretty sure boost 1.67.0 can stay 3 months more around, especially > > since I see it is still not the only package using the old boost. > > > > No, it cannot as it entangles too many other transitions.
Which ones exactly, other than the ICU one? (And the ICU one could be easily done by rebuilding boost1.67.0 too) > boost1.67 will be shortly removed from both testing and unstable. Again, please open bugs about this. Also, where is this info coming from? I don't see anything in https://bugs.debian.org/961995 (boost-defaults transitions) https://bugs.debian.org/ftp.debian.org (ftp-masters bugs) > Since the package is broken in both testing and unstable, in different > ways, please request its removal. The package in unstable is *not* broken. > Please stop intentionally delaying completion of multiple archive > transitions. This is definitely way too harsh and untrue, especially when you are providing literally no references to blocked things or schedules for removals. > Would you like me to upload NMU to delayed/2 that disable python bindings? Please not, and please rather answer the questions I asked. Thanks, -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
