On 2005-01-18 Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diffutils (2.8.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
> * Repackaged source without the GFDL-covered manual. Closes: #212523.
[...]
> [ The new diff-doc package is in preparation and almost ready, there
> is a preliminary version in my home page at people.debian.org ].
Hello,
Wouldn't it be better to keep this updated diffutils out of sarge
until diff-doc has been uploaded (and accepted) to non-free? By
letting diffutils (2.8.1-8) _now_ into sarge we run a real chance of
shipping diff in sarge without documentation.
I realize this is more a question to the maintainer than to -release,
- the release team probably does not want to be drawn too deep into
discussions on the consequences of 2004/vote_004.
cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
http://downhill.aus.cc/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
