* Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050223 21:05]: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 08:15:04PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > There has one been a plan once to promote apt-listchanges to standard > > - the ability to send only "news" items was introduced and made the > > default. Even though this was done, apt-listchanges is still > > optional. I think apt-listchanges and its dependencies only need an > > override change but maybe there's more I've overlooked. Could someone > > look into this? Matt, do you know what happened to the plan of > > apt-listchanges to standard? > I adjusted the behaviour of apt-listchanges to make it suitable for > Priority: standard, discussing the process on -devel along the way. I then > pointed out (in private, I think) that python-apt, ucf and any relevant > dependencies would also need to be promoted to standard, and it wasn't clear > whether that was OK. I can remember that having apt-listchanges installed at a buildd breaks the buildd, as the installation of files in the chroot is stuck. Is this still the case? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
