On Mar 04, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > udev 054-1 breaks users of /dev/parport[0-9], as the naming scheme has > been changed to /dev/parports/[0-9]. Or so claims the bug report I've > got on libieee1284. Right, I forgot to edit the rule in udev.rules. I will fix it in the next udev upload. Editing the rules file is trivial enough that 054-1 should NOT be delayed entering testing because of this, considering that libieee1284 is not a widely used package.
(BTW, libieee1284 should support /dev/parports/[0-9] too because this is the devfs naming scheme.) -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
