On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:50:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:27:53AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > That's useful to know, but doesn't seem to be correct in the arm case at > > least. > > > > 1. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all out-of-date. > > 2. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all priority low. > > That's urgency low, and as I said, has nothing to do with it.
You're right. I meant to say priority optional. > The documentation says that section is ordered alphabetically, > however, this is wrong. There is a list of the section each > having a value. OK, that explains the behaviour. > > What's the purpose of sorting by section in the ordering? > They are also an ordering of what is most important. Isn't the priority sufficient to do that? What makes sound more important than electronics? It's a bit demotivating to be continually trumped by equally optional packages, especially as packages are being added to the top of queue quicker than they're being pulled off. geda-gschem is now #52. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
