Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's also no reason *not* to request immediate removal of > vips7.10 from sid, AFAICT; you've made it clear that this package is > no longer needed or desired in unstable except on arm due to a > missing build, and removing it from unstable has no adverse effect > on testing.
I have requested removal. I apologize for taking so long to request removal -- I was trying to do what I thought was best for the packages (smooth rename transition), but I know it's long past time for me to stop putting this ahead of other considerations. (This would have been over months ago had it not been for several old problems that are now solved and not worth dredging up.) As soon as nip2 transitions (i.e., gets built on arm), vips7.10 should be disappear from sarge on its own. I assume this will happen in time for the release without any manual intervention now that the arm buildd situation is so much improved. Worst case, removing nip2 from arm should let vips7.10 disappear from sarge and nip2 transition for everything else, but let's hope it won't come to that. Let's hope this is the last message on this topic. Thanks for your patience. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
