On Sat, 7 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote: > > So: How a package which may not be installed reached testing? > > Does this breakage mean that the current checks made by the testing > > scripts are not enough? > > I didn't mention testing at all. Nothing is broken in testing.
I am really puzzled now. Why gettext 0.14.1-11 for testing-proposed-updates FTBFS on mipsel, then? Are uploads for testing-proposed-updates build on a sarge chroot or not? I initially fixed Bug#307749 in unstable, and it FTBFS in a lot of architectures, so I said: > [ Hmm, I wish autobuilders ran sarge for packages that are going to be part > of sarge, at least during the freeze ]. and Steve replied: > Well, if you'd care to upload getext 0.14.1-11 to testing-proposed-updates, > that can be arranged :) I interpreted that in the sense that uploads for testing-proposed-updates are already built on a sarge chroot, but now I'm not sure, as you say "Nothing is broken in testing". See why I am so confused? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
