On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:45:29PM -0700, Guido Trotter wrote: > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:29:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Mmm, you can contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] to ask for it to be looked > > at; I don't know that requeuing it would give any different results. In > > general, it's a good idea to build-depend on a real package instead of a > > virtual package, to ensure you get the interface you actually want. > I see... would you advice me to upload a version with this fix or it's better > if > I ask the powerpc admin to look at it? Till now I didn't have this kind of > problem with the autobuilders, but if you think that it's a good idea (and > you're going to approve the new package for sarge) I can make the change... I would recommend fixing the build-depends; such a change would be fine for sarge. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
