El vie, 13-05-2005 a las 11:12 -0400, Joey Hess escribiÃ: > Paul Cupis wrote: > > >>I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please > > >>consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge. > > > > > > Approved with the usual testing delay. > > > > The maintainers for this package appear to have made a subsquent upload. > > Will there be any chance of this newer version getting into sarge, or > > will we now have to live without this package? > > Well they packaged a new upstream version, which I have not reviewed, > but which I doubt is going to get into sarge. At this point the only > option seems to be t-p-u, but I think you need to get the maintainer on > board and caring about getting thier package into sarge instead of > obstructing it first.
If t-p-u is needed, let's use t-p-u. Using t-p-u is not so hard (a bit messy). If you think that this is the best option, a package for t-p-u can be prepared this weekend. -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
