On 15 May 2005 at 12:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:21:53PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > On 14 May 2005 at 18:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | > whereas my shlibs is unversioned, hence the mismatch/lack of entry for
| > | > RQuantLib:
|
| > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libquantlib0.shlibs
| > | > libQuantLib 0 libquantlib0
| > | > libQuantLibFunctions 0 libquantlib0
| > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>
|
| > | > That warrants a new libquantlib0 release, doesn't it?
|
| > | Yes, it does.
|
| > New quantlib 0.3.9-2 packages (libquantlib0, libquantlib0-dev,
| > quantlib-example) are on their way now.
|
| > I will follow up with new versions of quantlib-ruby, quantlib-python and
| > r-cran-rquantlib by tomorrow to give the autobuilders a chance to prepare
| > 0.3.9-2 which these will depends upon.
|
| Doh. All four of these need to be reuploaded? I thought only
| r-cran-rquantlib was broken..?
Well, look two quotes above where we determined that my shlibs was fscked
(which indeed it was). Not one of the depending packages had a correct
Depends line due my bad shlibs file.
I haven't build quantlib-python and quantlib-ruby. If you want, I can skip
the upload but it would be cleaner to rebuild'em.
Regards, Dirk
--
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
