Torsten Werner wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >> If the maintainer agrees that this package should not be included with >> sarge, then it is of course reasonable to drop it (preferably with a >> transition package providing an upgrade path to gnome-terminal, if that's >> the appropriate replacement). > > > It depends on the year, when sarge will be released. :-) Too many people > are still using MGT today because of some of its outstanding features > that are not implemented in gnome2's terminal emulator. I will MGT for > sarge and ask for removal from etch if nobody takes over the package. >
I was unaware of this. I guess I should have checked its popcon rank :) Personally, I have used both and found the new gnome-terminal to be generally superior. But I guess OPMMV (other people's mileage may vary) and they may actually like it better. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
