Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> I wouldn't call this important, as it's not a critical package or
> anything. I would make it a normal or even minor severity bug.
It's very important if you run multiple FOM's. :) I think the
severity of the bug is appropriate.
No, it's not a critical package, most aren't. None the less, I think
the changes between 2.721-4 in testing and 2.721-6 in unstable, a
translation and an important bug fix, make it worthy of consideration
for sarge. I am hoping the release-team thinks so.
Here are the changelogs once again:
faqomatic (2.721-6) unstable; urgency=high
* Added Czech debconf translation, (thanks Miroslav Kure; closes:
#308060).
-- Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 7 May 2005 13:35:51 -0400
faqomatic (2.721-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Extended the maintenace job setup to accomodate multiple FOMs.
(closes: #303178).
* Extended README.Debian to explain how to setup multiple FOMs.
* Added NEWS.Debian.
-- Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:27:37 -0400
thanks.
--
Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
