martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0344 +0200]:
>> libcwd is licensed under the QPL, about which there was an extended >> debian-legal thread a while back and non-free seemed to be the >> consensus (he says warily, not particularly liking trying to summarize >> debian-legal). > I don't think consensus ever existed on debian-legal. For what it's > worth, I disagree with you. I was actually basing that in part on your comment in the bug log about "debian-legal deciding," so in that case I will certainly withdraw the conclusion. I read some of the discussion, but I don't remember it well enough to know whether there was a consensus or not. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
