tags 304260 -fixed
thanks

Hi Bill,

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 10:18:49AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> tags 304260 - patch
> thanks
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:20:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Andr�s,
> > 
> > I've prepared a 0-day NMU for this bug, which will be uploaded shortly.  The
> > patch is attached.
> >  
> >    * debian/patches/15_space-bug.dpatch:
> > diff -u lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst
> > --- lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst
> > +++ lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst
> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
> >     db_get lilo/runme || true;
> >     if [ "$RET" = "true" ]; then
> >             echo "Running lilo..."
> > -           /sbin/lilo || true
> > +           /sbin/lilo
> >     fi
> >  
> >     ;;

> This patch is a noop, because lilo.postinst does not 'set -x', (which is
> yet another policy violation), so the error status of lilo is ignored
> anyway. This caused problems in upgrade-report bug #310653.

Thanks for catching this.  Looks like another upload is needed. :/

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to