Il giorno ven, 10-06-2005 alle 18:58 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG ha scritto: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:14:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > >> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.10.2300 +0200]: > >> > Currently, I am planning to stick around for etch. If we're still > >> > waiting > >> > for etch two years from now, it's hard to predict how I'll feel at that > >> > point. :) > > > >> QUICK, ALL: this should be enough of a reason to get etch out in > >> a year! > > > > ... which as I've said repeatedly, I have no intention of trying to do. > > Why not? The following seems like a reasonable plan to me: > > By the end of June, decide the release criteria. > > By the end of September, have the GCC changes in place and other > infrastructural changes that we know we expect. Have filed bug > reports on whatever new RC issues will need to be fixed for etch. > (Such as the GCC change, and whatever else.)
Why do you want a new release without other new important packages like, just to make an example, X.org? There are a lot of new large packages that needs a *lot* of testing before being releaseable. I think a one year release is really impossibile, while a two years release seems reasonable to me. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
