Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you're still too caught up on libstdc++, the library. The library > is not the C++ ABI, just like how libgcc is not used by all C programs. > The C++ ABI involves things like how classes are laid out and how function > names are mangled.
So what we do *not* need here is the idea of a special Build-Depends to signal this kind of thing. That would be a disaster. >> If the ABI changes but not the SONAME then the only sane thing to do is >> to encode the ABI in the package name, e.g. libstc++-6c1002. Just like >> for any other lib doing the upcoming c++ abi transition. > > We agree on this. Bingo, me too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
