On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:24:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm going to blithely assume the -cd and -boot and any other interested > folks are watching. > > Here's what I'm thinking for r1, anyway. I'm thinking a timeframe of > a couple of weeks, so around the last week of September and the first > week of October. > > I'm thinking we'll want to include:
> * recompiled binaries on, eg, arm that were out of date or ususable The autobuilders are currently not running on proposed-updates; no one has had time to address this issue. We want to find a way to deal with this - it may mean creating 2.2r1 in two steps (allowing a day or two to autobuild and then adding that second wave to stable) if no one addresses the quinn-diff issues. Either that or an awful lot of concerted effort to build the necessary packages by hand, once we have a list. > * any bug fixes the boot-floppies people have come up with > > * new boot-floppies / base.tgz's for all arches to match the fixes > and any base package updates > > * source updates to some base packages like xviddetect (these'll > need to be recompiled on all architectures, and done before > boot-floppies are rebuilt) > > * source updates to various packages that had known important > bugs that were fixed too late for r0 (these'll also need to > be recompiled for all architectures) > > * updated release notes For one thing, here's another vote to add in mozilla M17 - this is of the general "it won't be any more broken" class. More importantly to me, I will have a new yaboot package in a day or so, which will need to go into stable - I'll be adding dbootstrap code for it too, hopefully, and make the powerpc port able to make hard disks bootable again. Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
