On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: |Pretty much the key goal for potato updates is: | | * it shouldn't break *any* working potato systems | |That is, there shouldn't be any reason to run r0 instead of r1 or r3 |instead of r8. If there's any risk of things breaking it needs to be |left for woody where we can spend time getting it widely tested, and fix |other stuff. Note that unlike the test cycles we don't really have *any* |possibility for testing updates to potato any more.
How about those documentation only packages, most noticeably the doc-linux* packages? Most of them are dated January and looks like they need some updating. -- Anthony Wong
