Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just found out through a bug report that all the flavoured 2.2.19-2 > kernels did not have the flavour set when make-kpkg build was being called. > This means that they will *not* work out of the box. > > A fixed version is being built right now. > > Considering this and the fact that there are no matching pcmcia modules in > 2.2r3 for 2.2.19-2, as well as the fact that the boot floppies didn't > actually use it,
For precisely this reason, I used 2.2.19pre17 for the boot-floppies that went into i386. Your subject line is alarmist. The default kernels for i386 were *not* botched in 2.2r3. > it would be good to have 2.2r4 go out very soon with just > these fixes. Um, can someone explain to me the urgency of using 2.2.19 rather than 2.2.19pre17? My experience of the 2.2.19 kernels is that they are still unsuitable for building. I will research more so I can more demonstrations of this. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
