On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:53:22AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Your subject line is alarmist. The default kernels for i386 were > *not* botched in 2.2r3.
Huh? That's precisely what the subject says. > > it would be good to have 2.2r4 go out very soon with just > > these fixes. > > Um, can someone explain to me the urgency of using 2.2.19 rather than > 2.2.19pre17? I never said that 2.2.19pre17 is broken. I was talking about the kernel-image packages, not the boot floppies. > My experience of the 2.2.19 kernels is that they are still unsuitable > for building. I will research more so I can more demonstrations of > this. Please do so. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
