On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > * tests > > > > Some upgrade tests from "gnome 2.4.1 sarge" to "gnome 2.6 experimental" > > have been successfully made. Upgrades from unstable to experimental have > > been tested too with success. > > > > Is there anything else expected from the release team for Gnome2.6 > > before the upload to unstable or are we ok now ? > > What about upgrades gnome woody -> gnome 2.6? Seems to me that this is > the most important upgrade to test. > > Of course it's totally optional, but you could also try whether some of > the common gnome backports upgrade well, maybe there are only > easy-to-solve issues.
just my curiosity, which kind of RC bugs can arise from failing upgrades? dom -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
