On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > > * tests > > > > > > Some upgrade tests from "gnome 2.4.1 sarge" to "gnome 2.6 experimental" > > > have been successfully made. Upgrades from unstable to experimental have > > > been tested too with success. > > > > > > Is there anything else expected from the release team for Gnome2.6 > > > before the upload to unstable or are we ok now ? > > > > What about upgrades gnome woody -> gnome 2.6? Seems to me that this is > > the most important upgrade to test. > > > > Of course it's totally optional, but you could also try whether some of > > the common gnome backports upgrade well, maybe there are only > > easy-to-solve issues. > > just my curiosity, which kind of RC bugs can arise from failing upgrades?
Failing upgrade from last Stable: RC (unless the stable version was so broken it didn't work in the first place, but that's not the case with Gnome) Failing upgrade from some testing/sid version: important at most -- RC == Release Critical, and testing/sid are not part of a release, so cannot possibly affect releasability. Failing upgrade from unoffical package like a backport: wishlist at most, but a maintainer is fully free to ignore/close that bug, especially if it has no patch / too interfering patch. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
