Andreas Barth writes: > * Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050726 12:34]: > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Currently, we have (at least) two large transitions at our hands: > > > 1. gcc-4.0/glibc > > > 2. xorg > > > > > > I really would be happy if we can avoid that tetex becomes part of any > > > of these transitions. That means for me, in doubt don't upload tetex > > > to unstable right now. > > > How long do you expect the transitions to take, and what would you think > > is appropriate to replace doubt by knowlegde? > > What is appropriate for the second: Bring up ftp-master again :) > > Well, xorg seems to depend only on some small issues. Without being able > to investigate further right now, we should be able to solve that in > less than a weeks time after ftp-master is available again - or at > least, we know much more. When that is done, I don't see a hard stopper > for uploading tetex to unstable, except of course you should notify the > maintainers again (e.g. via debian-devel).
please make sure, that tetex-bin builds on all architectures. avoid having new arch-indep packages in unstable and unbuildable arch packages. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
