On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:23:10 +0200, Eric Heintzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I co-maintain the GNUstep Core packages for more than 2 years, and I > spend a lot of time to find a solution to these problems by moving > files accordingly to FHS, and by symlinking some directories. After > several tests, I have to admit that I am not able to make GNUstep FHS > compliant without breaking it. And I don't think that is possible, > except if upstream developers change their mind. Have you been successful it making it more FHS compliant? (e.g. moving Library/Headers to /usr/include, moving Library/Preferences, Library/Images, etc. to /usr/share, etc.) Is there anything in particular that caused problems? >From what I can tell, it's not possible to make GNUstep completely FHS compliant without a lot of upstream help. But it looks like we should be able to make it more compliant than it currently is. > Since there is no other maintainer to try to make these packages FHS > compliant, should GNUstep be removed from Debian ? I would be interested in helping at some point. But not until at least the middle of next month. -- Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
