On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:48:38 +0300, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:52:48AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: >> * Ask the RMs/QA for an exception due to GNUstep's nature > There is already a precedent in FHS - the /usr/lib/X11R6 directory. > GNUstep is not a different case, just a less important one. For now. /usr/lib/X11 is actually specified in the FHS to be a symlink "to /lib/X11, or to whatever /lib/X11 is a symlink to". (At least that's what it says in FHS 2.3.) /usr/X11R6 is specified specifically as an option in FHS and was basically grandfathered in. And it seems Branden thinks that it will eventually disappear (or at least be replaced by symlinks). http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg01578.html I think it would be very hard to get /usr/GNUstep added to FHS. For some strange reason, -policy seems to be rather quiet on this issue this time around. There's only been one reply, by Ola, who thinks that GNUstep is not non-compliant. -- Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
